Relevant
books
available at Amazon
Clement studies and translations
with links to Amazon
--------------
TEXTS &
TRANSLATIONS
Chadwick H.
Alexandrian Christianity
--------------
Ferguson J.
Stromateis 1-3
--------------
STUDIES
Ashwin-Siejkowski P.
Clement of Alexandria:
A Project of Christian Perfection
--------------
Chadwick H.
Early Christian Thought
and the Classical Tradition:
Studies in Justin, Clement and Origen
--------------
Hägg H. F.
Clement of Alexandria
and the Beginnings
of Christian Apophaticism
--------------
Osborn E.
Clement of Alexandria
--------------
|
XI. What then was it which persuaded him to flight, and made him depart from
the Master, from the entreaty, the hope, the life, previously pursued with
ardour?—“Sell thy possessions.” And what is this? He does not, as some conceive
off-hand, bid him throw away the substance he possessed, and abandon his
property; but bids him banish from his soul his notions about wealth, his
excitement and morbid feeling about it, the anxieties, which are the thorns of
existence, which choke the seed of life. For it is no great thing or desirable
to be destitute of wealth, if without a special object,—not except on account of
life. For thus those who have nothing at all, but are destitute, and beggars for
their daily bread, the poor dispersed on the streets, who know not God and God’s
righteousness, simply on account of their extreme want and destitution of
subsistence, and lack even of the smallest things, were most blessed and most
dear to God, and sole possessors of everlasting life. Nor was the renunciation
of wealth and the bestowment of it on the poor or needy a new thing; for many
did so before the Saviour’s advent,—some because of the leisure (thereby
obtained) for learning, and on account of a dead wisdom; and others for empty
fame and vainglory, as the Anaxagorases, the Democriti, and the Crateses.
XII. Why then command as new, as divine, as alone life-giving, what did not save
those of former days? And what peculiar thing is it that the new creature the
Son of God intimates and teaches? It is not the outward act which others have
done, but something else indicated by it, greater, more godlike, more perfect,
the stripping off of the passions from the soul itself and from the disposition,
and the cutting up by the roots and casting out of what is alien to the mind.
For this is the lesson peculiar to the believer, and the instruction worthy of
the Saviour. For those who formerly despised external things relinquished and
squandered their property, but the passions of the soul, I believe, they
intensified. For they indulged in arrogance, pretension, and vainglory, and in
contempt of the rest of mankind, as if they had done something superhuman. How
then would the Saviour have enjoined on those destined to live for ever what was
injurious and hurtful with reference to the life which He promised? For although
such is the case, one, after ridding himself of the burden of wealth, may none
the less have still the lust and desire for money innate and living; and may
have abandoned the use of it, but being at once destitute of and desiring what
he spent, may doubly grieve both on account of the absence of attendance, and
the presence of regret. For it is impossible and inconceivable that those in
want of the necessaries of life should not be harassed in mind, and hindered
from better things in the endeavour to provide them somehow, and from some
source.
XIII. And how much more beneficial the opposite case, for a man, through
possessing a competency, both not himself to be in straits about money, and also
to give assistance to those to whom it is requisite so to do! For if no one had
anything, what room would be left among men for giving? And how can this dogma
fail to be found plainly opposed to and conflicting with many other excellent
teachings of the Lord? “Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of
unrighteousness, that when ye fail, they may receive you into the everlasting
habitations.” “Acquire treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust
destroys, nor thieves break through.” How could one give food to the hungry, and
drink to the thirsty, clothe the naked, and shelter the houseless, for not doing
which He threatens with fire and the outer darkness, if each man first divested
himself of all these things? Nay, He bids Zaccheus and Matthew, the rich
tax-gathers, entertain Him hospitably. And He does not bid them part with their
property, but, applying the just and removing the unjust judgment, He subjoins,
“To-day salvation has come to this house, forasmuch as he also is a son of
Abraham.” He so praises the use of property as to enjoin, along with this
addition, the giving a share of it, to give drink to the thirsty, bread to the
hungry, to take the houseless in, and clothe the naked. But if it is not
possible to supply those needs without substance, and He bids people abandon
their substance, what else would the Lord be doing than exhorting to give and
not to give the same things, to feed and not to feed, to take in and to shut
out, to share and not to share? which were the most irrational of all things.
XIV. Riches, then, which benefit also our neighbours, are not to be thrown away.
For they are possessions, inasmuch as they are possessed, and goods, inasmuch as
they are useful and provided by God for the use of men; and they lie to our
hand, and are put under our power, as material and instruments which are for
good use to those who know the instrument. If you use it skilfully, it is
skilful; if you are deficient in skill, it is affected by your want of skill,
being itself destitute of blame. Such an instrument is wealth. Are you able to
make a right use of it? It is subservient to righteousness. Does one make a
wrong use of it? It is, on the other hand, a minister of wrong. For its nature
is to be subservient, not to rule. That then which of itself has neither good
nor evil, being blameless, ought not to be blamed; but that which has the power
of using it well and ill, by reason of its possessing voluntary choice. And this
is the mind and judgment of man, which has freedom in itself and
self-determination in the treatment of what is assigned to it. So let no man
destroy wealth, rather than the passions of the soul, which are incompatible
with the better use of wealth. So that, becoming virtuous and good, he may be
able to make a good use of these riches. The renunciation, then, and selling of
all possessions, is to be understood as spoken of the passions of the soul.
XV. I would then say this. Since some things are within and some without the
soul, and if the soul make a good use of them, they also are reputed good, but
if a bad, bad;—whether does He who commands us to alienate our possessions
repudiate those things, after the removal of which the passions still remain, or
those rather, on the removal of which wealth even becomes beneficial? If
therefore he who casts away worldly wealth can still be rich in the passions,
even though the material [for their gratification] is absent,—for the
disposition produces its own effects, and strangles the reason, and presses it
down and inflames it with its inbred lusts,—it is then of no advantage to him to
be poor in purse while he is rich in passions. For it is not what ought to be
cast away that he has cast away, but what is indifferent; and he has deprived
himself of what is serviceable, but set on fire the innate fuel of evil through
want of the external means [of gratification]. We must therefore renounce those
possessions that are injurious, not those that are capable of being serviceable,
if one knows the right use of them. And what is managed with wisdom, and
sobriety, and piety, is profitable; and what is hurtful must be cast away. But
things external hurt not. So then the Lord introduces the use of external
things, bidding us put away not the means of subsistence, but what uses them
badly. And these are the infirmities and passions of the soul.
XVI. The presence of wealth in these is deadly to all, the loss of it salutary.
Of which, making the soul pure,—that is, poor and bare,—we must hear the Saviour
speaking thus, “Come, follow Me.” For to the pure in heart He now becomes the
way. But into the impure soul the grace of God finds no entrance. And that
(soul) is unclean which is rich in lusts, and is in the throes of many worldly
affections. For he who holds possessions, and gold, and silver, and houses, as
the gifts of God; and ministers from them to the God who gives them for the
salvation of men; and knows that he possesses them more for the sake of the
brethren than his own; and is superior to the possession of them, not the slave
of the things he possesses; and does not carry them about in his soul, nor bind
and circumscribe his life within them, but is ever labouring at some good and
divine work, even should he be necessarily some time or other deprived of them,
is able with cheerful mind to bear their removal equally with their abundance.
This is he who is blessed by the Lord, and called poor in spirit, a meet heir of
the kingdom of heaven, not one who could not live rich.
XVII. But he who carries his riches in his soul, and instead of God’s Spirit
bears in his heart gold or land, and is always acquiring possessions without
end, and is perpetually on the outlook for more, bending downwards and fettered
in the toils of the world, being earth and destined to depart to earth,—whence
can he be able to desire and to mind the kingdom of heaven,—a man who carries
not a heart, but land or metal, who must perforce be found in the midst of the
objects he has chosen? For where the mind of man is, there is also his treasure.
The Lord acknowledges a twofold treasure,—the good: “For the good man, out of
the good treasure of his heart, bringeth forth good;” and the evil: for “the
evil man, out of the evil treasure, bringeth forth evil: for out of the
abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.” As then treasure is not one with
Him, as also it is with us, that which gives the unexpected great gain in the
finding, but also a second, which is profitless and undesirable, an evil
acquisition, hurtful; so also there is a richness in good things, and a richness
in bad things, since we know that riches and treasure are not by nature
separated from each other. And the one sort of riches is to be possessed and
acquired, and the other not to be possessed, but to be cast away. In the same
way spiritual poverty is blessed. Wherefore also Matthew added, “Blessed are the
poor.” How? “In spirit.” And again, “Blessed are they that hunger and thirst
after the righteousness of God.” Wherefore wretched are the contrary kind of
poor, who have no part in God, and still less in human property, and have not
tasted of the righteousness of God.
|