Many Jerome
translations and studies with links to Amazon
--------
STUDIES
(Click on images below.)
The Monk and the Book:
Jerome and the Making of Christian Scholarship
Megan Hale Williams --------
Jerome:
His Life, Writings, and Controversies
J. N. D. Kelly --------
Saint Jerome in the Renaissance
Eugene F. Rice --------
Jerome (The Early Church Fathers)
Stefan Rebenich --------
|
LETTER XV.
TO POPE DAMASUS.
This letter, written in 376 or 377 A.D., illustrates Jerome’s attitude
towards the see of Rome at this time held by Damasus, afterwards his warm friend
and admirer. Referring to Rome as the scene of his own baptism and as a church
where the true faith has remained unimpaired (§1), and laying down the strict
doctrine of salvation only within the pale of the church (§2), Jerome asks “the
successor of the fisherman” two questions, viz.: (1) who is the true bishop of
the three claimants of the see of Antioch, and (2) which is the correct
terminology, to speak of three “hypostases” in the Godhead, or of one? On the
latter question he expresses fully his own opinion.
1. Since the East, shattered as it is by the long-standing feuds, subsisting
between its peoples, is bit by bit tearing into shreds the seamless vest of the
Lord, “woven from the top throughout,” since the foxes are destroying the
vineyard of Christ, and since among the broken cisterns that hold no water it is
hard to discover “the sealed fountain” and “the garden inclosed,” I think it my
duty to consult the chair of Peter, and to turn to a church whose faith has been
praised by Paul. I appeal for spiritual food to the church whence I have
received the garb of Christ. The wide space of sea and land that lies between us
cannot deter me from searching for “the pearl of great price.” “Wheresoever the
body is, there will the eagles be gathered together.” Evil children have
squandered their patrimony; you alone keep your heritage intact. The fruitful
soil of Rome, when it receives the pure seed of the Lord, bears fruit an
hundredfold; but here the seed corn is choked in the furrows and nothing grows
but darnel or oats. In the West the Sun of righteousness is even now rising; in
the East, Lucifer, who fell from heaven, has once more set his throne above the
stars. “Ye are the light of the world,” “ye are the salt of the earth,” ye are
“vessels of gold and of silver.” Here are vessels of wood or of earth, which
wait for the rod of iron, and eternal fire.
2. Yet, though your greatness terrifies me, your kindness attracts me. From the
priest I demand the safe-keeping of the victim, from the shepherd the protection
due to the sheep. Away with all that is overweening; let the state of Roman
majesty withdraw. My words are spoken to the successor of the fisherman, to the
disciple of the cross. As I follow no leader save Christ, so I communicate with
none but your blessedness, that is with the chair of Peter. For this, I know, is
the rock on which the church is built! This is the house where alone the paschal
lamb can be rightly eaten. This is the ark of Noah, and he who is not found in
it shall perish when the flood prevails. But since by reason of my sins I have
betaken myself to this desert which lies between Syria and the uncivilized
waste, I cannot, owing to the great distance between us, always ask of your
sanctity the holy thing of the Lord. Consequently I here follow the Egyptian
confessors who share your faith, and anchor my frail craft under the shadow of
their great argosies. I know nothing of Vitalis; I reject Meletius; I have
nothing to do with Paulinus. He that gathers not with you scatters; he that is
not of Christ is of Antichrist.
3. Just now, I am sorry to say, those Arians, the Campenses, are trying to
extort from me, a Roman Christian, their unheard-of formula of three hypostases.
And this, too, after the definition of Nicæa and the decree of Alexandria, in
which the West has joined. Where, I should like to know, are the apostles of
these doctrines? Where is their Paul, their new doctor of the Gentiles? I ask
them what three hypostases are supposed to mean. They reply three persons
subsisting. I rejoin that this is my belief. They are not satisfied with the
meaning, they demand the term. Surely some secret venom lurks in the words. “If
any man refuse,” I cry, “to acknowledge three hypostases in the sense of three
things hypostatized, that is three persons subsisting, let him be anathema.”
Yet, because I do not learn their words, I am counted a heretic. “But, if any
one, understanding by hypostasis essence, deny that in the three persons there
is one hypostasis, he has no part in Christ.” Because this is my confession I,
like you, am branded with the stigma of Sabellianism.
4. If you think fit enact a decree; and then I shall not hesitate to speak of
three hypostases. Order a new creed to supersede the Nicene; and then, whether
we are Arians or orthodox, one confession will do for us all. In the whole range
of secular learning hypostasis never means anything but essence. And can any
one, I ask, be so profane as to speak of three essences or substances in the
Godhead? There is one nature of God and one only; and this, and this alone,
truly is. For absolute being is derived from no other source but is all
its own. All things besides, that is all things created, although they appear to
be, are not. For there was a time when they were not, and that which once was
not may again cease to be. God alone who is eternal, that is to say, who has no
beginning, really deserves to be called an essence. Therefore also He says to
Moses from the bush, “I am that I am,” and Moses says of Him, “I am hath sent
me.” As the angels, the sky, the earth, the seas, all existed at the time, it
must have been as the absolute being that God claimed for himself that name of
essence, which apparently was common to all. But because His nature alone is
perfect, and because in the three persons there subsists but one Godhead, which
truly is and is one nature; whosoever in the name of religion declares that
there are in the Godhead three elements, three hypostases, that is, or essences,
is striving really to predicate three natures of God. And if this is true, why
are we severed by walls from Arius, when in dishonesty we are one with him? Let
Ursicinus be made the colleague of your blessedness; let Auxentius be associated
with Ambrose. But may the faith of Rome never come to such a pass! May the
devout hearts of your people never be infected with such unholy doctrines! Let
us be satisfied to speak of one substance and of three subsisting
persons—perfect, equal, coeternal. Let us keep to one hypostasis, if such be
your pleasure, and say nothing of three. It is a bad sign when those who mean
the same thing use different words. Let us be satisfied with the form of creed
which we have hitherto used. Or, if you think it right that I should speak of
three hypostases, explaining what I mean by them, I am ready to submit. But,
believe me, there is poison hidden under their honey; the angel of Satan has
transformed himself into an angel of light. They give a plausible explanation of
the term hypostasis; yet when I profess to hold it in the same sense they count
me a heretic. Why are they so tenacious of a word? Why do they shelter
themselves under ambiguous language? If their belief corresponds to their
explanation of it, I do not condemn them for keeping it. On the other hand, if
my belief corresponds to their expressed opinions, they should allow me to set
forth their meaning in my own words.
5. I implore your blessedness, therefore, by the crucified Saviour of the world,
and by the consubstantial trinity, to authorize me by letter either to use or to
refuse this formula of three hypostases. And lest the obscurity of my present
abode may baffle the bearers of your letter, I pray you to address it to
Evagrius, the presbyter, with whom you are well acquainted. I beg you also to
signify with whom I am to communicate at Antioch. Not, I hope, with the
Campenses; for they—with their allies the heretics of Tarsus —only desire
communion with you to preach with greater authority their traditional doctrine
of three hypostases.
|